« wanna bet? | Main | where my peeps at?! »

how you dress has nothing to do with your effectiveness

Respect? Please. You think cops don’t catch flak from the public? I’ll put down a ten-spot that says your average big city beat cop would gladly trade his daily dose of fisticuffs and bodily fluids over your average Screener’s diet of dirty looks and snide comments.

Dressing up as a cop doesn’t make you a cop, just like wearing a badge doesn’t make you Sgt Angel. Abuses? Sure, but its not like this doesn’t happen now. Are Screeners enforcing the law? To an extent yes, but then under the proper circumstances so is a flight attendant, so do they get B&Cs too?

I think this is a bad idea not because I think Screeners don’t deserve respect; I’m against it because its “cop-creep.” If this is a job that doesn’t merit being sworn - or even being “inherently governmental” - then you should figure out a more appropriate way to dress and equip the people who do the job. If I remember right, back when private screeners were the norm, they wore a soft uniform. Its not like a hard uniform increases effectiveness.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://haftofthespear.com/cms/refer.cgi/1064

Comments (3)

The more defensive the TSA gets about their legitimacy the harder their uniforms become.

In the real world the client decides whether the security officers will look like cops or suits or Home Depot sales help, based on the strategic communication/influence operation statement the client wants to make to the public. Private security providers offer the hard look to enhance public compliance and reduce argument by fooling the majority into believing “shirt wearers” actually do have real authority and actually can force compliance upon them. The more the security officer looks like somebody who can whack you with a baton or taze you or shoot you the more likely you are to comply.

The TSA never should have been created. American and United should have been sued into oblivion to encourage the other airlines to get their security act together and compete on making screening as efficient as it has to be to mitigate their risk and as painless as possible to their customers.

Mark Twain said, “Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society.”

Michael Tanji [TypeKey Profile Page]:

I’ll confess that checking out the new shirts and badges at National this week, they do look a lot more authoritative than the old mall guard outfits of old. Not all airports have them though, if MKE and MSP are any indication. No one who travels with any frequency is going to mistake a screener for a cop, but they do go a long way in conveying that getting uppity isn’t going to achieve much … which reminds me, pushy old br0ad with the 10 lbs of jewelry, oversized carry ons, etc., etc. no, actually, its NOT TSA’s fault you’re late to the gate and no we don’t want to hear about it, moron.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 16, 2008 6:12 PM.

The previous post in this blog was wanna bet?.

The next post in this blog is where my peeps at?!.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

   subscribe

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35