Like you needed reminding:
Public concern rose a notch last week when The New York Times reported that one of the most popular English-language sites was run by a 21-year-old Qaeda enthusiast named Samir Khan from his parents’ home in North Carolina. Mr. Khan has done so since late 2005, unchallenged by law enforcement authorities.
“Isn’t there anything this fellow can be charged with, or is he completely free to aid the global jihad from North Carolina and give interviews to The New York Times?” Robert Spencer wrote on his site, Jihad Watch.
But those who are reading Mr. Khan’s blog include officials at the Combating Terrorism Center who, since last year, have been training F.B.I. agents and analysts with the government’s joint terrorism task forces.
Center officials say Mr. Khan’s blog yielded confirmation of an important discovery: that a host of militant sheiks and scholars, dead and alive, are today far more influential than Osama bin Laden …
Quite apart from the intelligence value of leaving the sites up, it’s not clear what can be gained by shutting them down. Operators of the sites have proved difficult to put behind bars …
Take downs make you feel good, but they accomplish little to nothing save for making it harder to monitor and disrupt online activity. That last part - disruption - is the key, and we would do well to learn a lesson from another quarter.

Comments (2)
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/15-11/ff_rossmiller?currentPage=all
Behind Enemy Lines With a Suburban Counterterrorist
Posted by Cannoneer No4
|
October 23, 2007 3:06 PM
Posted on October 23, 2007 15:06
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071029/COMMENTARY/110290009
Taking down terrorist Web sites
Posted by Cannoneer No4
|
October 29, 2007 1:25 PM
Posted on October 29, 2007 13:25