A real OPSEC problem:
Detailed schematics of a military detainee holding facility in southern Iraq. Geographical surveys and aerial photographs of two military airfields outside Baghdad. Plans for a new fuel farm at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.
The military calls it ”need-to-know” information that would pose a direct threat to U.S. troops if it were to fall into the hands of terrorists. It’s material so sensitive that officials refused to release the documents when asked.
But it’s already out there, posted carelessly to file servers by government agencies and contractors, accessible to anyone with an Internet connection.
A fake OPSEC problem:
The U.S. Army has apparently threatened a government secrecy expert for posting online a new unclassified Army policy document, just days after he was quoted criticizing the policy itself as “outrageous.”
Per section 2-1 of AR 530-1, I wonder if all those involved will be investigated for their role in facilitating SAEDA? If you are holding your breath, stop.

Comments (1)
Ya know while sometimes I cringe at the stuff Aftergood posts, I ca nasure you that I get his email, read his mail and use the service. I believe that the bad done by the exposure will solve some issies in the future.
OPSEC afterall is an evolving process. If were not reminded or kicked when we fubar how will the op ever sec?
Posted by Mark
|
July 17, 2007 10:35 PM
Posted on July 17, 2007 22:35